Legislation & Other Important Issues

What's in a Name Can Hurt You
Canine Legislation, and What You and AKC Can Do About It  
From the AKC Breeder Newsletter Summer 2011

It’s hard to be a breeder or an AKC club member without hearing warnings – at least occasionally – about the vast amount of canine legislation introduced throughout the country each year. So far in 2011, the AKC Government Relations team (AKC GR) is tracking over 1,000 legislative proposals, and over one-third of them directly impact those who breed dogs.

For hobby breeders, one of the most significant new trends – and threats – are bills that define all breeders as commercial enterprises. For many, the concept of being a “commercial” or “high-volume” breeder sounds so foreign that it’s hard to imagine such legislation could impact them. But the truth is, commercial breeder legislation can impact anyone who keeps intact dogs, and especially anyone who has ever bred – or may breed a dog.

Even when the stated purpose of legislation is to regulate commercial breeding operations, it’s important to look at how the term “commercial breeder” is defined, as many bills seek to heavily regulate so-called “commercial breeders” based on the number of dogs owned, not on the “commerce” actually conducted.

The AKC respects the important role high-quality professional breeders play in meeting the demand for quality pets. These breeders provide beloved pets and they deserve recognition for the good job they do. Far too often, the creation of restrictive new laws – rather than the enforcement of existing negligence/cruelty laws – to crack down on a few bad actors ends up missing the intended mark. Instead, it targets small hobby breeders who hand-raise puppies and requires them to obtain new commercial licenses, be subject to inappropriate inspections, or comply with facilities requirements designed for large commercial kennels.

One of the most significant and easily overlooked issues is the impact that changing the official categorization of a home-based/hobby enterprise to a commercial operation can have. In many cases, this may actually jeopardize a person’s home! Someone who has lived their entire lives in a residential community may suddenly find they are in violation of local zoning laws, even though nothing they do has changed.

Legislation requiring small breeders to comply with regulations designed for large commercial operations can result in unintended consequences, including:

• Placing so many demands on breeders that they can no longer breed at all

• Forcing breeders to change from a small home-based model to a larger commercial-style model that they don’t have the resources or the desire to operate, or worst of all

• Forcing breeders into a situation where they may be violating the letter of the law merely by providing the best possible care for their dogs.

For any hobby breeder who has ever thought that commercial-breeder legislation does not impact you, consider this:

The current definition of “commercial breeder” in Nebraska includes anyone who owns four or more intact females intended for breeding. This definition illustrates several common issues. Even if there is no intention to breed the dog, the burden of proof is on the owner to prove a negative. Under this law–regardless of whether you have actually bred a dog – you are technically considered to be a commercial breeder. And once you are designated by the state to be “commercial,” you can then easily run afoul of local zoning or other ordinances.

Legislation currently before Congress (S. 707/H.R. 835, known as “PUPS”) would require anyone who owns or co-owns dogs that produce more than 50 puppies that are sold in a single year to be regulated in the same manner as a USDA puppy dealer (wholesaler). Legislation sounds benevolent enough, but consider this: If you co-own several dogs bred just a few times in a single year, this could include you. Even if you never whelp a single litter, or see a single puppy, you could be subject to licensing and inspection as a commercial breeder.

What is AKC doing about it?
With so many purebred dog owners and breeders under legislative attack, it’s not surprising, that one of the most common questions we hear is, “What’s the AKC doing about canine legislation?”

AKC GR is charged with addressing issues on a daily basis that impact the rights of responsible dog breeders and all dog owners. Advocacy works best when those directly affected by it take the lead in working with legislators. For this reason, AKC GR does not regularly send staffers out to legislative trouble spots, but instead provides educational, informational, and training resources that enable the residents of a community – those most affected by the laws – to take the lead in working for policies that best address their needs.

Some of the department’s work is conducted outside the public eye. While it may sometimes appear that the AKC is not actively involved in the legislative process, this is not the case. Some of AKC GR’s greatest successes are the bills you never hear about – those that have never been formally introduced or have never made it past committee hearings.

Other times, legislation and legislative issues are best addressed by public input. This is when AKC GR issues Legislative Alerts or news items and provides constituents with sample letters and talking points. In some cases, staff may conduct legislative training sessions or lobby days.


AKC GR provides a wide variety of resources to support clubs, federations, breeders and individuals in protecting their rights, including:

• AKC GR staff ready to work with you one-on-one and address your concerns

• A growing list of AKC state federations – coalitions of breeders and fanciers on the ground at state capitols and local communities working together on legislative issues

• A contracted federal lobbying team in Washington, D.C.

• The ability to send targeted e-mails to specific states or communities facing legislative battles

• AKC GR’s online toolbox – a one-stop shop for data, talking points and other resources to help fight bad legislation

• An online legislation tracking system, providing up-to-date information on state-level bills in all 50 states

In 2011, AKC GR has already made thousands of contacts with legislators and posted scores of Legislative Alerts both online and to targeted areas. With our federations, AKC has been on the front lines of successful legislative battles in 2011 from Hawaii to Mississippi, Virginia, Colorado, and Wyoming, just to name a few.

What You Can Do
As an AKC breeder, you are an acknowledged expert in your breed, and dogs in general. You have a unique opportunity and responsibility to make your voice heard–especially when faced with issues that may adversely impact responsible dog owners in your community.

Most politicians know very little about dogs and even less about breeding and showing.

Educating your legislators–especially before an issue ever comes up – is one of the most important things you can do to ensure dog owners and breeders interests are served when canine legislation is introduced. Consider scheduling a 10-minute appointment with your local representatives. Introduce yourself and offer to provide insight on dog issues. This will give you access if canine legislation is introduced in the future.

Here are a few suggestions on other ways to get involved:

• Make sure your clubs have Legislative Liaisons and work within a state federation. AKC GR depends on liaisons and federations as two-way information channels to learn about possible local ordinances and to get the word out about new legislation. If we don’t hear about an issue, we can’t help. Likewise, if clubs and individuals do not get our information, they can’t respond to it.

• Support – and encourage your club to support – the AKC Canine Legislative Support Fund (CLSF). These donations support advocacy efforts around the country, including legislative empowerment seminars at national specialties and all-breed shows, statewide lobby days, and the development of advocacy training programs.

• Support the AKC Political Action Committee (PAC). The AKC PAC accepts contributions from individual AKC club members and uses 100 percent of those funds to support the campaigns of breeder-friendly candidates for political office. For more information, visit akc.org/pac

 

Ronald N. Rella, Director, Breeder Services
Email: AKCbreeder@akc.org
Customer Service | Phone: 919-233-9767 | Email: info@akc.org

© The American Kennel Club 2011


IN CASE YOU MISSED THIS, FORGOT or just "didn't have time" at Thanksgiving, Frank Losey is asking for our help once again. Frank's strategically-planned campaign, "How To Spay/Neuter the HSUS", continues to be a huge success, because of YOU!

But, it is imperative that everybody send the letters, make the calls, etc, when he asks, so that each step of the way is completed before the next step is to go forward. PLEASE do this, do it again if you want to, forward to your clubs, friends, relatives, lists, Facebook, Twitter, etc. There is no such thing as "too many" when it comes to getting government attention from citizens.

The methods given below are easier now than they have ever been! (and, nobody's asking for money!!! Just a few short minutes of your time)

Flood the OIG Office with thousands of e-mails, faxes, letters and phone calls. A “flood” of requests will be compelling and will further show the OIG that tax-paying citizens are concerned and are requesting immediate action by the IRS to hold the HSUS accountable to the U.S. Tax Code.

  • OIG E-MAIL ADDRESS: Complaints@tigta.treas.gov (Subject: OIG Case File 55-1005-0025-C)
  • OIG FAX: 202-927-7018
  • OIG HOTLINE PHONE: 1-800-366-4484 (may be anonymous if you choose)
  • OIG MAILING ADDRESS: Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, HOTLINE, P.O. Box 589, Ben Franklin Station, Washington DC 20044-0589

The message to the OIG may be as simple as: “I am writing (calling) about your Case File Number 55-1005-0025-C; and the IRS Tax Fraud Case File Number 29-92012. Would you please direct that the IRS expedite its on-going investigation of the excessive lobbying activities of the Humane Society of the U.S. and its potential failure to report over $500 Million in revenue on its tax returns, all of which have been substantiated by over 1,400 pages of documents that the IRS has received. The IRS investigation is now over 2 years old, and should not be allowed to drag on any longer.”

So that I may keep a running count of the total number who have contacted the OIG:

  • If you send an e-mail, Blind-Copy Frank on your e-mail (f.losey@insightbb.com).
  • If you fax or call, just shoot me an email with subject line “Fax’d/Called OIG.”
  • Or mail a confirmation to Frank Losey, 2029 Tampa Blvd., Navarre, FL 32566). Thank You!

See: www.saova.org/SpayNeuterHSUS.html


Legislative Corner By Amy Peterson, as published in the NENews, September - October issue

The following information was provided by the National Animal Alliance Interest (www.naiaonline.org)

DO YOU KNOW WHAT LEGISLATION YOU ARE SUPPORTING?

Do pictures of neglected or abused animals make you feel sad or angry? Of course they do - - as they should! But don’t let yourself be manipulated by the imagery.

It pulls on the heartstrings of any compassionate person who sees images of sickly animals in filthy, cramped conditions. It spurs a desire to act, a desire to do something to put an end to such horrors. But it is important to step back and ask a few questions before opening your
wallet or leaping on the legislative bandwagon:

  • What do these images represent?
  • Are these images representative of a practice as a whole, or of an irresponsible or incompetent outlier?
  • Are the images you are seeing depicting situations that are already illegal?
  • What are the ultimate goals of the people who are presenting the images to you? Legislation? Fundraising? Do they want to put an end to the cruelty they are showing you, or are they trying to promote another
    agenda altogether?

WHY LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT

Recent legislative efforts to replace the term “Owner” with the gentler sounding “Guardian” seem kind-hearted on the surface. And these efforts are even supported by many dog owners who have not yet considered the ramifications of such a seemingly innocuous change.

But such changes in terminology have legal consequences: if you no longer “own” your dog, you no longer have the property rights to use your knowledge and values to protect him, and restrictions on your rights to breed, sell, or show your dog become much easier to legislate. And the people who are pushing hardest to change dog owners’ status to “guardian” know this. It’s important you know this, too!

So continue to love and respect your animals, and please continue supporting reasonable cruelty laws and restrictions. They make a positive difference! And just as importantly: make sure you are aware of who shares your values and goals and who doesn’t before donating to any animal groups or supporting any animal legislation.

DO THE ANIMAL GROUPS YOU SUPPORT SHARE YOUR BELIEFS?

Donating to an animal group can be worthwhile, but you should be careful to familiarize yourself with a group’s background and philosophy first. Is it an animal welfare group or an animal rights group? It is important to know the difference!

Animal welfare is a philosophy that advocates that people who keep and utilize animals have a moral responsibility to assure their well-being, and to protect them from abuse and unnecessary suffering.

Animal rights is a philosophy that feels animals should be viewed as legal persons, not property, and that they should not be used as food, for clothing, in research, or entertainment.

Given the fact that the vast majority of Americans are philosophically closer to animal welfare than animal rights, many animal rights groups have become careful to couch their arguments in terms of protection in order to mask their abolitionist agenda. The best way to discern a group’s true philosophy is to make yourself aware of their legislative history and agenda.

If you view your beloved pet as your property, eat an occasional steak, wear leather or wool, support animal research, and attend rodeos and/or the zoo, it might be a good idea to take hard look into the agenda of the animal groups you support. Make certain you are not funding legislative efforts to change your lifestyle in ways you do not want!

Legislative Corner By Amy Peterson


 

LETTER FOR YOUR VETERINARIAN

 

Please consider sending this to your vet if you are concerned about your right to own and breed dogs.

Below you will find an example letter you may send. You can "copy and paste" this into your favorite text editing software or use one of the files here, which are the same letter but in formats you may find easier to use.

  • Letter for Your Veterinarian in .DOC format (Microsoft Word, fully editable)
  • Letter for Your Veterinarian in Fill able .PDF format (you can fill in your name, vets name and the date, then print out)

 

(Text of letter follows)

 

(Date)


Dear (your veterinarian),


As a concerned pet owner/breeder/exhibitor, I am extremely worried that in just a few short years, I will no longer be able to enjoy life with my pets. Under the guise of “animal welfare,” animal rights groups are systematically chipping away my right to own pets and enjoy the human-animal bond.

There is a huge difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights.

Animal Welfare is a philosophy that advocates that people who keep and utilize animals have a moral responsibility to assure their well-being, and to protect them from abuse and unnecessary suffering. Animal Rights is a philosophy that advocates animals should be viewed as legal persons, not property, and that they should not be used in any way.

Groups such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and HSUS (Humane Society of the United States, no direct affiliation with local humane societies) conduct major political lobbying at the state and federal levels and spend millions of dollars annually to promote their agenda and to elect candidates that favor their agenda. That agenda, while couched in terms of animal welfare, is, in many cases, designed to restrict and eliminate a pet owner’s right to own animals.

Eliminating the right to own pets will severely affect your veterinary practice...

Animal Rights organizations spend millions of dollars a year lobbying politicians. Breed restrictions, early spay and neuter, crop and dock bans, are all examples of legislation which limits and eliminates pet ownership, community by community, state by state. These groups feel pet ownership, livestock, food animals, hunting, medical research, zoos, circuses, rodeos, horse shows, dog shows, cat shows, bird shows, guide dogs, service dogs, police dogs, and search and rescue dogs are all “exploitation” of animals and attempt to end them. They also chip away at the rights of pet owners and their veterinarians to determine the proper veterinary treatment of their pets’ health and welfare.

Laws banning ear cropping, tail docking, debarking, declawing, or enforcing early spay and neuter protocols attempt to dictate how you practice medicine. These are surgical procedures that should be decided on a medical case by case basis in the best interest of the animal patient, between you, the veterinarian, and me, the pet owner - not a politician.

I believe that veterinary medical decisions should be made by veterinarians and pet owners, not by politicians…

Animal Rights groups encourage politicians to enact both drastic and seemingly insignificant changes to current legislation. They play to our emotional, not factual based decisions.

The “owner” vs. “guardian” issue is a perfect example. While on the surface, replacing the term “owner” with “guardian” in legislation seems to be innocuous, kind-hearted, and a gentler term to use, in reality, it takes away a pet owner’s property rights to own, breed, and even provide veterinary care for their pet. Once a pet owner is deemed a “guardian,” it opens the door for third parties to step in, on behalf of the pet, and override decisions made on behalf of the pet, including veterinary care.

Imagine having to get permission from not only the pet owner, but a third party “guardian” whenever you recommend a medical procedure. Imagine having your medical protocol questioned in the local courts when a “guardian” decides to intercede and files an injunction on behalf of the pet to prohibit your recommended course of treatment.

Continuing to allow Animal Rights groups to influence local legislation is harmful to our rights as pet owners and your rights to determine how you practice veterinary medicine.

This directly affects your ability to both practice veterinary medicine and earn a living. Without a pet population, veterinary medicine would be severely limited, if not totally destroyed.

As a veterinarian, and a respected member of our community, your involvement is crucial in the fight against anti-pet legislation.

Two great sources of information on how to battle this type of legislation are the NAIA (National Animal Interest Alliance) and the American Kennel Club.

The NAIA (www.naiaonline.org) is an association of business, agricultural, scientific, and recreational interests dedicated to promoting animal welfare, supporting responsible animal use, and strengthening the bond between humans and animals. Their members are pet owners, dog and cat clubs, obedience clubs, and rescue groups, as well as breeders, trainers, veterinarians, research scientists, farmers, fishermen, hunters, and wildlife biologists. Through the NAIA and the NAIA Trust (www.naiatrust.org) whose mission is to promote the welfare of animals, strengthen the human-animal bond and safeguard the rights of responsible animal owners, enthusiasts and professionals through education, legislation and the courts. Their web sites are filled with facts, figures, and sample talking points to help you become an expert advocate.

The American Kennel Club (AKC) Government Relations Department
(www.akc.org/canine_legislation) is dedicated to protecting the rights of all dog owners, recognizing that advocacy works best when those who are directly affected by the legislation take the lead in working with policymakers. With 125 years of experience in the study and welfare of dogs, the AKC is a leading expert on responsible dog ownership, care, well-being, and public policy issues that pertain to dog ownership. The primary role of the AKC in the area of canine public policy is educational and informational. There is a wealth of information available to you to support the fight against anti-dog legislation.
Animal Rights legislation affects all of us that love our pets. Not only does it affect the pet owner, but the pet industry as a whole, including veterinary medicine, groomers, trainers, pet stores, and breeders.

We can’t let the benefits of the human and animal bond be taken away from us. We must all work together to preserve our life with animals. As pet owners, we rely on you, our veterinarian, to be there for our pets’ medical needs, and to counsel us on their health and well-being. We are already engaged in this battle with the Animal Rights groups. We need your help!

Grass roots efforts at the local level are what win the battles against this type legislation. Get involved. Go to your city or county commission meetings. Facts and figures coming from you, the veterinarian, create far greater impact than from pet owners alone. After all, most city commissioners, county commissioners, and legislators own pets, and trust their veterinarian. You are the expert on veterinary care. They will listen to you.


Best regards,




(your name)


 

HSUS UNDER INVESTIGATION

 

http://humanewatch.org/index.php/site/post/congressmen_sniff_out_hsus_lobbying/

http://tinyurl.com/29hn79p

Jul 09 2010
Congressmen Sniffing Out HSUS Lobbying

Two Members of the U.S. Congress are hot on HSUS’s trail for what may be
excessive lobbying, and the IRS is apparently taking a hard look.

Here’s a little background: In March we spoke with attorney Frank Losey,
who is independently leading a campaign to get the IRS to investigate
whether HSUS’s wide-ranging lobbying activities violate its 501(c)(3)
charity status. As of March, his effort had generated over 4,000
grassroots letters to the IRS, and hundreds or letters to Members of
Congress.

And the effort has apparently been yielding some serious fruit.

In a letter from March 23 that's just surfacing this morning,
Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) wrote to IRS Commissioner Douglas
Shulman to convey his concerns about HSUS’s lobbying activities.
Specifically, Luetkemeyer singles out the apparent conflict of interest
in Michael Markarian’s role as head of HSUS’s lobbying arm (the Humane
Society Legislative Fund) and his positions as HSUS Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer. Luetkemeyer also notes HSUS’s own admission
that it “helped to pass…a total of 470 new state laws in the last 7
years.”...

 


 

 THE OHIO COMPROMISE

7/7/2010 7:59:00 PM
The Ohio Compromise

By ANDY VANCE
Agri Broadcasting Network

http://tinyurl.com/252kw2t

"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other
(guy) die for his." - General George S. Patton, Jr.

Many of us made the mistake of thinking we were going to war, proudly
carrying the battle standard for farm families, consumer rights, truth,
justice, and the American way. Staring back across the mud and the blood
were a group of idealists one Ohio farm leader popularly referred to as
"radical anti-meat terrorists."

The problem is we weren't really fighting terrorists; we were fighting a
sophisticated regime of well-funded mercenaries intent on destroying us
from within. We thought we were fighting for General Patton across
Western Europe, when really we were fighting the Cold War. The good guys
blinked, and last week Ohio farm leaders brokered a compromise with the
Humane Society of the United States.

General George Patton is one of my favorite historical figures. The
greatest wartime General in modern history, Patton was as famous for his
efficiency in defeating Nazis as for his inability to navigate politics.
Patton's writings are particularly applicable to the feelings of many
Ohio farmers following the "Ohio Compromise" between farm groups and
animal rights activists....

(view the entire article)


 

AKC RESPONSE TO FEDERAL PUPS BILL

 

[Thursday, July 22, 2010]

The American Kennel Club and our Washington, D.C.-based advocacy team continue to closely monitor S. 3424/H.R. 5434, the federal Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety (PUPS) Act. There has been no official action on the bill since its introduction in late May.

As previously reported, the 2010 PUPS bill seeks to expand federal regulation of dog breeders who breed and sell more than 50 puppies a year directly to consumers. This version is a significant improvement over previous versions, which focused on the number of dogs owned, regardless of what was bred or sold. This version would require the new category of breeders to abide by basic minimum standards of care and conditions and to abide by new performance-based exercise requirements.

However, the AKC also has a number of serious concerns with the bill as introduced. Some of these concerns include:

  • Definition of "breeding female" as an intact female dog aged 4 months or older. Female dogs are not sufficiently mature at 4 months of age to be bred.
  • Definition of "high volume retail breeder" that is overly broad and does not take into account co- and joint ownerships. Additionally, a reference in this definition to the number of dogs owned by a breeder is unnecessary and potentially misleading.
  • Exercise language should be clarified to ensure that the daily exercise requirements do not preclude training that involves other types of activity as well.

We will continue to monitor this legislation vigilantly and to outline our concerns regarding PUPS legislation to appropriate members of Congress and staff. Given the issues that AKC and other responsible dog owner groups have raised, and that Congress will be in session for fewer than six weeks prior to the November elections, it is not likely that there will be action on PUPS in the near term.

AKC will continue its education campaign with legislators and we will keep you up to date on any new developments.

For more information about the PUPS bill view the links below:


NEAA Legislative Liaison, Amy Peterson, elvbend1@mchsi.com
www.elvbendelkhounds.com/blog

 


Home | About the Association | Code of Ethics | Mission Statement | Board of Directors | Bylaws | Working Rules | Public Information | Events | 2012 National Specialty | Past Events Results | Regional Clubs | Awards | Donations | Yearbook | Links | Breed Information | Training | Reading List | Canine Health and Research | Rescue | Breeders Directory | Breeder Resources | Judges Education | Statistics | Juniors | Pedigree Search | NE News | Legislation | Forms | Contact NEAA | Our Mail Box